In a cunning, the Court of Justice of the Federal District and Territories (TJDFT) 2nd criminal class upheld the conviction of a person for illegal fishing in the field of environmental protection. The suspect was sentenced to a year and three months in prison, served in half -ophane and punished two restrictions.
The court, in November 2022, fishing in a lake in a lake, fishing in a lake in a region, which is in a law protected in a law and the people. Fishing Petrechs and a small amount of fish during the approach. The defendant admitted that he knew the ban, but he chose to fish in place for comfort.
Defense argued for the application of the suspect’s behavior on the principle of importance due to minimal damage to the environment. However, the TJDFT rejected the dispute and fished in a permanent area of protection, especially in a spring, fishing was a high degree of reprodus. In this sense, although the volume of fish seized in the power of the defendant is seized, the behavior applied by him is very highly reprodused, he preferred the crime for the protection of the defendant and said he had a crime. “
In addition, the defendant committed a crime while spending time in another crime, which led to a negative assessment of his social behavior. Defense claimed that it was BIS in Ideum (the same truth for the same truth), but the court clarified that the repetition and social behavior was evaluated from a doublet that did not double penalty.
The decision took the repetition of the defendant and the inconvenience of the disadvantage, the semi-inopen regime for the beginning of the verdict. TJDFT pointed out that the superior regime is in accordance with the superior justice (STJ) law.
* Information about Tjdft
Source link
