Jannik Sinner successfully defended the open title of Europe on Sunday, 6-3, 7-6 (4), 6-3 (4), 6-3 victories, 6-3 victories, Alexander Zverev won 6-3.
The guilty title was ruthless and did not face a break point for two hours and 42 minutes.
Italian showed the power of firing in addition to the starting lane that won him in 21 matches in 21 matches.
Meanwhile, Zverev did not leave the third loss of Melbourne because he followed an inaccessible major.
Australian open 2025 end result
| Winner | Loser | Selfish |
|---|---|---|
| Jannik Sinner (1) | Alexander Zverev (2) | 6-3, 7-6 (4), 6-3 |
Quick Match Repetition
A quick match to re-report: The sinner could never enter the front leg, although this is closer to Zverev’s dashboard.
From the beginning, the ability to dominate the foundation of a limited army of Sinner, for points that earn 85% of points in the first service in the opening set.
Sascha, only according to the service, was statistically close to parity for the best of the tour. He saved numerous break points in the opening matches.
However, Zverev struggled to find a rhythm and faced with pressure, if he was faced with the pressure, if he had served the sixth break point.
In the second set, Zverev played a break points in the three-thirds and began to look more comfortable. When 5-4 and 6-5 leads, it reached 30-30 in the sinner’s ministry, but the Italians finally failed to break a tie.
Both players have earned their previous tie breaks in Melbourne, but two sets of sinners are capitalized on a hilarious net cord in 4-4 of the lead.
The ruthless ball in the third set of sinner has proved a lot to Zverev, which seemed slightly in definitivity as they committed some space mistakes, and went to defeat a flat bunch.
First I would like to start with Sascha. Again, a difficult day for you, all your team and family. I have an incredible team behind you and there is an incredible player. All players and coaches believe yourself because they know how strong you are as a player and human. Keep it and try because we believe you can lift one of them very soon. We worked a lot to be in this position and it’s an incredible feeling to share the moment with all of you. I know that part of the team is at home and family, but it is amazing to share these feelings with you. I know Darren (Cahill) is probably your last Australia as a coach and I am very pleased to share this cup with you. When coaches and fiets change my union I have started everything, I am very pleased with being all of you. Guilty of the cup presentation.
Compatible stats
| Jannik Sinner | Alexander Zverev | |
|---|---|---|
| Greediness | Scorpion | Scorpion |
| Double drawbacks | 2nd | 2nd |
| 1st service percentage | 60 & (57/95) | 68% (65/95) |
| Won 1st service points | 84% (48/57) | 69% (45/65) |
| Won 2nd service points | 63% (24/38) | 50% (15/30) |
| Break points were saved | 0% (0/0) | 80% (8/10) |
| Medium 1st service speed | 196 | 206 |
| Medium 2nd service speed | 151 | 172 |
| Won 1st Return Points | 31% (20/65) | 16% (9/57) |
| Won 2nd return points | 50% (15/30) | 37% (14/38) |
| Break points turned | 20% (2/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winner | 32 | Scorpion |
| Blank errors | 27 | 45 |
| Net dots earned | 77% (10/13) | 52% (14/27) |
| Won service points | 76% (72/95) | 63% (60/95) |
| Return earned points | 37% (35/95) | 24% (23/95) |
| Got the total points | 56% (107/190) | 44% (83/190) |
| Won service games | 100% (16/16) | 86% (12/14) |
| Returned games won | 14% (2/14) | 0% (0/16) |
| General games won | 60% (18/30) | 40% (12/30) |
Summary
Thoughts in the final
Before this final, two important concerns forced me to think that I would see a sinful beat, and it was.
The first, based on what I saw in the semi-finals, if Djokovic was eligible, Zverev would easily beat.
He forced such a tiebrage on one foot and easily gained the opening set, created more break points and just lost with a usual volley botched.
Zverev played a very passive way, and during his hopeful time, it chose this game plan due to only the injuries of Novak, and the same story was in the final.
Second, Zverev was finally talked about “to get a little luck” to win a big slam. Speak like this, did not fill me with confidence that the match will approach. Here’s what Federer says last year:
I am not his coach, so I can talk to it free. When I play it, I see someone who plays very passive, playing a very protective way. It is great in defense, but I think it should look for a way forward. If it does, it can achieve great things. To win the Grand Slam, you should trust your shots and play more delicate. It has to believe this way. Every cell in your body should feel that this is just the right way. The title just doesn’t come to you. Not particularly the first. The federer animal.
See how approaches to the Madison keys; Like Zverev, another player with a few spectacular slams in the cup cupboard, was still historically weak. But he was spiked, went under a big pressure and pulled.
It’s easier than they do, but Zverev wanted to see a hybrid-type game – where he wants to deal with long rallies to test the sinner physically, but should only direct the ball to large targets. The tank caught how the sinner was in the tank, and two sets of hamstring and tested the end points.
Instead, he continuously struck the foreword and played in the first place. It was a similar story; He had to go away, but played a little poor sticks to prevent confident.
Can a slam win? I hope he will have to completely change the approach to the players as a sinner, and it will not allow him to move away with balls leading to the court.
As for culprit, he played a role in a tennis brand that dragged him into a number of the world. At the moment, he is the best hardcourt player in the world, but how many times it was “only billionTH of a gram,” BLA Ba’n’n the two doping tests failed. Two tests failed and I do not like how many red flags work.
What did you think about the final? Let me know in the comments.
