THere is something stupid than watching corporate giants makes a fool. The Behemoth Meta in question and when is Careless people, A whistle book by the former great worker, Sarah Williams, came out last week, the lawyers who caused panic immediately worked was deposited by the Urgent International Arbitration Court. This strange body is compulsory (and tough), orally, in writing or elsewhere (meta), or otherwise, or other harmful comments about its officers, directors or employees). His Publisher, Macmillan, made a comment It can be successfully generalized about it: “Fill.”
Obviously, no one heard in meter Streisand effects“An attempt to hide, remove or censorship the information he strives to increase public awareness of the words” an intimable result of censorship. ” The company has already ensured that Wynn-Williams will be the best in the world’s destructive criticism.
Here are a very delicious irony, recently turned into a highly voiced lawyer of “free speech”, or at least trying to stop the problem of Williams, who has a free speech, or at least free speech. For this, the old fashion term is hypocrisy. However, then six years in the interior of the Supreme Leader will suit him for him.
It is also an Canny operator. Meta did not have a clear idea of ​​this coming. Facebook whistlebol, which gives a complaint before publishing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SECOND) and the exchange commission, has adapted the playbook used by Facebook Whistlebol briefing Washington Post In the context; A attractive note Report with Emily Maitlis two weeks before the publication; and a true coup de grace – a view of Steve Bannon merry podcast.
What is the most forcibly from Wynn-Williams, as what Microsoft’s Bill Gates, as what is Microsoft, is really a corporate extension of the higher ruler. Zuck’s special shareholding means that he has full control of the company. In itself Permanent Sec documentsThere is always a paragraph that the company can sell against all shareholders and the management staff.
The result, as a corporation, meta always follows the obsessions of Zuk. It has been to ensure the exponential growth of these user numbers for many years. Zuck, the world game fanatics looked very much to the world looking at the conquest games. The thing that really angry him, there was a huge area of ​​the world – China – closed him. In the 78-page file of Wynn-Williams to Sec (and which Washington Post The allegations of the allegations) were allegedly made to enter the world’s largest market for years.
These efforts include: In 2015 to allow “Editor-in-Chief” to give the “Editor-in-Chief” to the “Editor-in-Chief”, and the “editor-in-chief” will allow the “editor-in-chief”; “Chinese Team” collection for a project to develop the services of the services to China in 2014; Given the weakening of privacy protection for Hong Kong users; Establishment of a special censorship system for China with automatic detection of restricted conditions; and Guo Limits Wengui AccountThe Chinese government critic proposed to develop cooperation after the Chinese Internet regulator. These corporate efforts were only stopped after Donald Trump and Joe Biden was considered as a strategic threat to the United States.
In his time, Wynn-Williams in Meta observed many of the close-range activities. In this sense, perhaps the most useful thing about his mischief is the fact that a great technological company really provides an intimate view. Surprisingly, this is the digital equivalents of the oil, mining and tobacco congroup of the analog period, which are surprising. And all US companies, this is also an inseparable to the people of the American state.
After the newsletter promotes
This has great effects for England. For example, the government’s Meta, X (Née Twitter), the attempt to adjust Amazon ET, means accepted by Trump as an economic war act. Starter for Starmer & Co. came to grow up a little spine and stop stopping kool aid on AI spread so freely by the Tony Blair Institute. And the Secretary of Technology, Peter Kyle, when to recognize when With the participation of US technology has become a matter of national security.
John Noughton is a professor of the public understanding of technology at the open university
Do you have any views on issues raised in this article? If you want to submit a letter up to 250 words to be considered for the publication, send us an email as an observer .Thes @ Observer.co.uk
