In a great exclusion, he was sentenced to two years in prison and sentenced to the old advantage of penalty aggression after falsified. The court will be replaced by two restrictions for the decision of the 2nd criminal class of the Court of Justice and Territories (TJDF) Court of the Court of the TJDF.
In this case, the suspect appeared to a police station and said he was raped while working with the former employer. He claimed that he had to protect physical contact and even intimate relationships to protect his stage. However, the police investigation showed that the prosecutor’s office was not established because the versions presented by the accuser were not conflicting. In addition, mobile phones showed that the past is even threatened when he was not read.
The defense defendant could actually sacrifice, but could not abuse due to the lack of witnesses. The prosecutor, in turn, claimed that the intention to coincide with a certain crime, not the evidence. In one part of the decision, the cases investigated, the suspects were the innocence of innocence and still motivated the opening of a police interrogation against him.
The Board stressed that the crime of defamation occurred when someone who knows that someone who knows that someone is innocent is an investigation or process. According to the work document, the initiative of the initiative to accuse the former advantage was created in revenge without any concrete evidence. Thus, the class assessed that the behavior of the defendant had a serious impact on the former employer who conducted unfair research.
Source link
