Lourtenia Lombaard, he acknowledged that the police informed the use of R1 000 promised to pay for the sale of the child, fear, anger, drug use, the police informed the police
Six-year-old Joslin Smith returned to the stand of the state’s star in court for the stealing and human trafficking, repeatedly accepted the media about his knowledge of the police and the loss of the child.
Lourtenia Lombaard, a promised payment of R1 000 for fear, anger and drug use, as well as the promised payment of R1,000. The issue is heard in the Western Cape Supreme Court sitting in the Gulf of Saldanha.
Lombaard, the prosecutor’s office, only a decision by the judge if the witnesses are listened to the judge, testify in a decision to be given the judge.
Lombaard, Joslin’s mother, Kelly Smith, said he could not inform the authorities to the authorities allegedly sold the child to Sangoma.
State Smith received R20 000 R20 000 with the third in the case of the three-February 20, 2024, on February 18,000, the next day of the child. He has not seen since Joslin.
Lombaard, who re-ill and helped the courtroom on Tuesday, continued to examine the exam by Rhinesh Sivnarain on Wednesday.
Under the inquiry – often triggular concerns and referee Nathan Erasmus – Lombaard admitted that they had several opportunities to explain what they know, but did not choose.
Although he knows about the events around the child’s missing, he showed himself as an observation in media interviews.
According to the testimony, Smith suggested that R1 000 was silent – a payment of never.
Joslin was allegedly sold for “eyes and skin”, Lombaard previously reported the court.
Lombaard’s officials’ detention information is the Night of the Date Joslin’s disappearance.
During the first visit, he accepted to lie to the police, to remain silent next day and to be lying in his primary arrest.
He claims that the right account was officially in October 204, in October 204, in October 204.
During the test, Lombaard, who was asked by Erasmus, confirmed that R1 000 played a role in playing the promised R1,000. “That’s right,” he said, when asked if he had influenced the silence of money.
Sivnerain, because he did not provide information immediately to the police, he did not hand over Lombabaard, he said, “Boeta” Appollis “Boeta” Appollis “Boeta” Appollis (number one charge) explained.
This conversation, testimony, appeared in front of the couple on February 18, and one of Smith’s sons played in another room and Joslin.
Lombaard later, the suspect, Stefano Van Rhyn – a friend of the couple, Smith “SMITH said,” According to Lombaard, Van Rhyn R1200 offered a silent claim.
The four adults participating in the work are under the influence of both tikes or Mandrakh around the missing child. They applied to regular medication.
According to the court testimony, Joslin was missing in the afternoon on February 19. Smith only said the child was missing at 9 o’clock at 9 o’clock.
Lombaard said that police shared the husband, the Ayan and their children in early 19th or early morning.
Although he now discussed his daughter, he discussed his plan to sell his daughter, Lombaard said this information was not voluntary to officials.
Instead, he, in the ear of the police – “tell the police what you do with your child.”
Officials claimed “just walked away.”
Sivnarain pressed why he did not talk to the police, Lombaard replied: “I was afraid. After we decided to tell anyone, I didn’t know how to talk to the police. “
“You were afraid to tell them, but you said (Smith) tell them?” Sivnara’s asked.
He replied.
When asked what he was afraid, Lombaard replied: “They will close me.”
Erasmus, because R1 000 smith remains silent, he said he promised to play a role in his inactivity. Lombaard confirmed it.
“Which role?” Erasmus asked.
We responded to “we must say no one.”
The judge further: “You say, He should tell the police what he did with his child. You say, Did you say that you mean (Smith) in front of the police?”
“I was not afraid, I’m angry,” said Lombaard.
“You just said that he was afraid of me. What was he afraid or angry?” Erasmus asked.
“Angry” Lombaard replied that when he met the railway in front of the police, he said he was anger that raised his voice.
All three of the accused admitted that they are not guilty.
The trial continues.
