President Donald Trump’s dramatic cuts of Trump’s dramatic cuts are released from organizations who violated each of the non-profit sector. Stacy Palmer, CEO Chronicle of charityThe new leadership explores how the new leadership can adapt to the unexpected philosophy, the variety, capital and incoming and entering and entering the connections that connect Americans.
This is a shortened transcription of an interview Rapid reactionThe editor-in-chief was hosted by Robert Ambassador Fast company. From the team behind Scale masters Podcast, Rapid reaction Sincere conversations that manage real-time problems with today’s best business leaders. Subscribe Rapid reaction Where do your podcasts for you will never lose an episode.
For for non-profit, assistance groups, universities and hospitals trust in government grants. Trump management was originally in the late January, fully freezing and fully freezing and loans and canceled loans, but the subsequent cuts solved. Then he checked a lith in the last address of the Congress, as a waste, as Absurd Grant. What happens? What is the mood in the world of charity? Is anger, frightening? Do you have applause?
Nonprofits and funds are mostly terrible for very different reasons. One is about philosophy of cutting this help. One is about direct impact on its own organizations. The other, there is a fear for the safety of employees – there are many concerns about whether the whole target of non-commercial goals caused individuals or cyberscase. Therefore, I say most people in the non-profit world are in a very bad situation, and when I have a worse and a large number of incisions in my history that covers these organizations.
Conservatives are very random that seemed so sensitive to the government’s cut and waste that the waste is not a philosophy of philanthropic and how it is thinking about it. This comes, it goes. This means that non-profit organizations cannot work. This means that the foundations cannot understand what the smart strategy will do. Thus, it is a very rough time in the non-profit and basic world.
You mentioned the concerns for physical safety outside the finance. Do you have any examples of this or stories? Do you hear this from certain institutions?
I have talked to several grants that the first demand is the financing of the first demand for additional finance and the most controversial issues, LGBTQ rights, such organizations related to the target of such things. They say they are worried about dicoxing and I have no example, but I can’t say what they caught samples due to fear.
Things move so fast. I know you start to try to keep up with Trump Diary. The money still flows but no one is? Or it was cut and that’s what turns into a crane like a crane we like?
Some groups, a trial, although the money should not flow, he said he did not flow and frozen. Environmental groups, for example, they could not understand what happened without releasing them with banks, and therefore controversy.
Not that no help is not the flow. I think there are some, but it is not in a way that you can understand that there are some agencies, not from some agencies and others. When you think about it, all the federal workers are put to burn spigots and are people who are sure to work and have occurred. Well, you can’t call man in the federal government you call. They are no longer there.
I care about how to describe the role of charitable and non-profit organizations in our general economy and society.
It is one of the things that people really do not understand that the billionaires are incredibly rich and are similar to Bill Gates and Melinda (French) doors, Warren Buffett and Dollar.
They give more than each of us, but they are small compared to the federal government. Gates Foundation can spend all the money in his coffins, and it will ensure the government’s operation in just one day.
Just scale is completely different. Thus, it is very important to understand the role of the government and it is twice. One is a direct funding of non-profit. Second, when the federal government and state and local governments are withdrawn, there are more than those in need. This means that they apply for non-profit cases for additional help. Therefore, what happened in these cuts is that only non-profit organizations have the support of the need to serve, but there are more people in their doors.
Thus, the scale of the philanthropist can do against the federal government is really important. Now it’s not to say that this philanthropy could not get more. As we all know, there was a big run in wealth. There are many billionaires who can give and make a difference in a very generosity. Thus, we call on non-commercial, of course, to do more and all the nation’s foundations, rockets, all the names they know, all you know step by step. But it would be foolish to think about what the government did.
I have to ask you about Elon Musk. What do people think in the world of charity? I want to say that there is a door fund. Bloomberg has the foundation. Musk is not necessarily recognized and it has a different effect.
Along with President Trump, President Trump, the most destructive things related to non-profit, only filtered and only the horrific organizations trying to make money from items such as homelessness, he said.
Thus, both polytheists have a lot of incredibly impressed by Trump, and it hurts incredibly. If they do not believe in the value of these organizations, it will damage the resources in a short time. However, if you were a young man who decides to have a career, if you want to be a non-profit or philanthropist, why would this make it that someone sounds like a dirty profession?
And I guess, in attacks on corporate and non-profit reactions, SEI or environment, how many turns in the semantic? I saw the term Green-resumes Increase, the opposite of green wash. To hide the efforts of sustainability, change the name of things that are dei to be something else. Semantics about this is the mission?
I know every foundation we say they see that they look at each word on the website and see if they have triggered words. As you can see in the federal government, lawyers consider everything in a foundation to make sure things are good. If there is no really clear management from management, you can imagine this reason that it is really long time, but no one should move quickly.
Is this any time in the history of the time you seek this changing dynamics in the White House and the edge or not really visible because it is not an unprecedented place?
The Reagan Administration had many serious cuts closest, and this philanthropist had all the discussion about this and the non-profit role. Thus, we asked what types of experts said. There are two conservatives and two liberal, which are currently involved in the non-profit arena.
The reason for this was that the reason was this misery and that one said that they are a very strong conservative, “We have never seen anything unclean.” Anger does not see if any of this assistance does not work and disturbs the people of any ideology (Trump and MUSK).
They want to talk about the government’s appearance. There may be strong disputes in this regard, but it seems unprecedented to people who watch during this period, it is difficult to have a playbuk. I think that’s why non-profit and foundations are fighting. What do you do when you can’t look at the date and understand what happened and how will you come together?
Charitable and non-profit works, in many ways, optimistic. Is there anything that makes optimistic right now?
I think the non-profit, which is ready to work collectively, this makes me optimistic, because sometimes do not worry about their communities, their own coffins, their own coffins and collective activities. But they will come together and if they continue to do so and be strong, it can make a big difference.
