Two years ago, the UN lived in an old school, which was expelled from the buildings of the High Commissioner for Refugees, Bronkhorstspruut, Gauteng. Felix says Kifoto, Left and Johnson Kadima, they collect frogs from a pond to eat for a little meat. Pictures: Kimberly Mutandiro
- For almost two years, refugees were expelled from the UN buildings and living conditions were deteriorated in Pretoria in UNHCR.
- Now they live in an old school building in a distant part of the bronchorstspruit. They are abandoned and forgotten.
- Ksenophobic says they want to move to another country rather than integrated into local communities.
- However, the UN Gact says that the relocation in another country is a limited choice because of the fact that the families in the bronchorstruit are not suitable.
Refugees get out of life From the outside of the United Nations Pretoria offices, the High Commissioner for Refugees (UN) say they will be more hungry than exposed children to xenophobia two years ago.
About 16 families live in an old school building between BronchorstPruit, Pretoria and Dahahleni. They were among the 33 families who camped outside the UN GOK offices one year Before and moved before expelled in 2023 old school. Gauteng or their countries of origin want to settle in a third country instead of returning to their homes in cities.
The Pretoria Supreme Court decided to launch April 2022 in April 2022 in April 2022. About 15 families chose to go to the repatriation center, while others chose to live on the streets with their children. The ministries of the mountains and the Valleys then took a step to provide asylum in one of the old schools located in a distant part of the bronchorstspruit. The building has four rooms, but there are no electricity and only two toilets. There is a tap in a few meters away.
School is on the main road, on a long dirt road. There are no shops, clinics or schools nearby.
When visiting the group, we found the parties near a close vacant pot of a hat that had a baked night.
Two people came up with a few frogs. To bring something to their empty-aged families, they said they were hunting the frogs in a nearby pond.
“We don’t know when to do the real meat. We would eat the frogs to keep our meat curves in bay … Johnson Kadima, first of the Congo democratic Republic.
Kadima has not seen three children because the UN was expelled from GOK. He said his wife was taken to Lindela, but returned without children. He said that they struggled to get a response about where children were. Hoping to find them and move them in another country.
Some of the refugees lie in a maceshift shelter.
Families have divided school with curtains, but there is difficulty to move. More people abroad are sleeping, and the curtains are a worn tent. Some families moved from the tent and made their shelters.
In a mobile clinic, who came to the family, a month ago, leaving them a month ago, leaving them without entering medications and treatment.
Since it was removed in 2023, the children did not participate in school and were in contact with many people outside the camp.
Refugees say that because they live there, they have only a few good to bring them to other supplies. There is a vegetable garden, but does not give enough products to provide them.
Despite these difficulties, refugees have refused proposals from human rights and faith, to approach the city or education for children. They say that their children do not want to face thoughts against schools or not to face documentation struggles.
The women are cooked outside the sewage of the sewage that fleeing blocked toilets.
“If our children go to school, then it should be outside South Africa. Therefore, we still ask to be taken to another country,” he said.
Flora Masamba is worried about the future of his 8-year-old son because he was never school. But he wants him to start school on another continent.
Delfhen Mukendi said he did not want to return to the South African school, because “children treated me like animals and I had lunch because I was a foreigner.”
Josephine Bitondo shares this gap with more than one person.
Lance Thomas, the University of Pretoria and Community Center, works with lawyers for human rights to help families. He said that the refugees turned into many options as to integrate into better shelters and communities with opportunities.
According to Thomas, people who want to help in food and funds, stopped after refusing to accept other aid of families. He said they thought to take the family to the Mozambican border.
“We met with housework and UNHCR, but nothing has changed. We plan campaigns for everyone to get everyone on the plate,” Thomas said.
Relocation is impossible
UNHC of GOK Jan de Bisschop said that the family was worried about the welfare of families, but as a group did not help them.
“We do not want to see children living in unusual conditions of refugees, especially children, so they are interested in this solution, or rejected the proposal or support of the voluntary repatriation.”
De Biscchop said that the refugees also offered the country’s countries with voluntary repatriation, but this offer was rejected. Transfer to a third country is “a very limited option” and “Subject to quotas that offer countries’. Group reviews do not include an UNHCR “well-defined system for relocation.”
The transfer is a “life-saving measure”, “the most risk, including violence or torture, a” life-saving measure protected for children and children and children with children and legal protection.
According to him, the parents of refugee children in South Africa and the parents of refugees were critical to register at school. “Many refugee families will endure deep trauma and instability due to the displacement, conflict or oppression. In these conditions, he serves as a way to re-education, lifestyle and lives.”
If the difficulty of receiving the children of refugee families to school, they were able to contact scissors with scissors and winter.
© 2025 Land. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noderivatives 4.0 International License.
You can repeat this article until you have this article, authors and surface and change the text. Please enter a link into the original article.
The article laid an invisible pixel that we can count the traffic for the founders again. All analytical means are only on our servers. We do not give our notes to any third party. Logs are deleted in two weeks. We do not use any IP address identifiers, except for registration of regional traffic. We are only interested in counting hits, does not give an explanation users. If you re-publish, do not delete the invisible pixel.
