Eric Girard deserves the invitation as an honorary member of the optimist club.
Costs can be reduced when charged with reducing services? If you don’t know that a recession is watching you? This is the finding of the return of the Minister of Finance to the budget balance.
This is a penultimate budget before the next election campaign. It goes down in two words: uncertainty and optimism.
Uncertainty comes from the orange elephant in the room. No one knows the degree of recession or upcoming economic slowdown. Neither his duration. Finance Minister Eric Girard, a projection of a few weeks ago, trust in a projection with 1.1% growth. It seems optimistic today. And although it is expected to start fedal, it relys on the increase in capital earnings …
For costs, optimism is even greater. He promises to -Aneamed FEAT: Strengthens costs by protecting public services.
Cunds are read at nurse stations in non-use medical image machines, nurse stations and schools in schools.
Another portrait emerges when you investigate budget documents. The government will have all the mistakes in the world to balance the budget for five years, as all the abuses require the law.
For example, in terms of patients and schoolchildren, this government is not enough. However, it is different for public finance.
Since it came to the power of the zagalogs, the taxation was reduced to the tax (first tax rate and school tax. The costs have increased faster than income. Mr. Girard’s problem is to return these curves without taxing the taxpayer further.
In June 2014, remember the famous budget for liberal hardness. The cost of the first year in power was 1.5%. Then they started up.
Zagalogs provide 1.7% of medium-year annual in 2025-2030 in 2029-2030.
Health is only between 3% and 4% of the required growth to store services. This is what we call “system costs.”
However, in 2025-2026 and 2026-2027, the increase in health care costs will be 3%, and then 2%. And you need a swelling for homelessness, mental health and home care.
Health Quebec was responsible for saving 1.5 billion this year. At the beginning of winter, the Minister of Health Christian Dubh acknowledged that the services would be affected. It was recently known that this goal will not be achieved.
Mr. Girard is not an ideologist. Looking for a happy environment between the two goals: protect state services and balance the budget. This mission is dangerous in defense.
The shortcoming should also be withdrawn in the context. In history, not the worst in permanent dollars. Combine to 1.3% of the gross domestic product (GDP). This is more than Ontario (0.6%). However, Federalty (1.6%) and British Columbia (2.1%) are less.
Liberals will remind him, but in 2018, Mr. Girard inherited 8 billion surpluses. Today, it is a structure and is about 4 billion.
Associated with the rights of a discussion in the state’s effectiveness. However, this budget proves that this should be worried. Because to improve public services or just to protect them, they need to offer them at a reasonable price. Efficiency is a situation for generosity.
François Legault promised that the government will be more effective and more wealth.
In recent months, it was difficult, northern, Taiga and electric lion, the battery sector, symbolized the flagship project.
This changes the budget approach. Instead of choosing with the result of which company strike a bargainQuebec varies taxes to stimulate the update. Experts welcome the newly simplified and expanded tax credit.
The effective situation is a long time. Treasury staff promises to save 3 billion by optimizing programs. This target is 2030. It is unknown and how.
At the expected level of expenses, the economy grew up in the expected proportion and has not been enough, even if they have effectiveness.
In 2028-2029, there is still 2.5 billion to balance the budget. Where will the amount be? Kvebec copper – Cross fingers – by an increase in federal transfers, productivity or state efficiency.
To win the elections, the satisfaction of the users of public services can be considered more than a balanced budget. This dilemma explains why the most difficult arbitrage seems to be deferred.
