The separation of a table believed to have a small position associated with a large worker decided to violate the workplace law, the employment trial.
The panel was reported to sit in one place where the work of young workers could “logically”.
As a result, such a seating organization can cause a workman’s connection to cartridges and cause a successful legal claim and a successful legal claim.
The verdict came to the work of an institution that resigned because he wanted to sit on the table “symbolically.
Nicholas Walker was asked to transfer branches, but not on the “back” table, but usually in the middle of the manager “in the middle” was not a seat on the table.
When he heard the 53-year-old 53-year-old 53-year-old resistance to the table, he said he did not say “a man of a man”.
Walker was the director of the company – immediately submitted his resignation and now set for a payment after the firm successfully sued the firm to dismiss unjust constructive.
The court hearing in Watford, Walker’s Rickmansworth since 2017, Hertfordshire heard the head of the department in Robsons.
In 2022, he was relocated to the nearby Chorleywood branch, but in May 2023, he was asked to return because he resigned.
Daniel Young, Walker’s department, Walker’s department decided to share his role with a smaller colleague, but it was not discussed with a property agent who thought he was back to his old role.
The court always used the “practical and symbolic significance because of the branch manager of the table behind the Rickmansworth office and where there are books and ledger.
Young counterpart, Matthewhe Gooder, moved to the back table after returning to the table, and the middle table will be used.
Walker said the Tribunala’s “silly” because this news would be “Assistant Manager”, he said. The young man was messaged and said, “I do not retreat … and sitting in the middle.”
They did not understand the “importance” of the young rear table and did not understand that the status of the walk was disturbed.
Tribunal was the right to see the Walker Table issue as “negative”.
Judge Reindorf said, Mr. Walker’s in terms of Mr. Walker (Mr. Walker), Mr. Gel was sitting on the table and sat on the middle table, he would be the assistant of his manager and Mr. Gooder said he would be the head of the department.
“It was a logical result for him in his case to make it weak to communicate with the logistics of Rickmansworth movement …
“The tribunal finds (it was) … behavior that is likely to destroy or seriously disrupt confidence and trust relationship.
“Or be a manager of auxiliary manager or become a joint manager with Mr. Gooder, Rickmansworth, Rickmansworth, who performed in Chorleywood, he was the only manager he led by this branch.”
Walker’s compensation will then be predicted.
