Progressives prefer consolation narratives over reality and damage the country for years
Item content
Reminiscent of Canadian Liberals, Twitter Circa 2015 has made a traditional rage dance this week. There was also hadhtag – #Womenagainstpooliievre – Facial X owner Elon Musk told users hashtags became inappropriate In December.
What was the clear crime caused by liberals and social media commentators post thing approve“It is incredible today and age,” Gilead Pierre wants to adjust the ovaries ” and “Imagine being a woman for this garbage and make voting. Ew!”
Ad 2
Item content
Of course, the conservative leader Pierre Poilievre has completely made a real statement. At a news conference on Monday, said“We will not forget that the 36-year-old young man is working faster than the biological hour runs faster than the child.”
When the male allies are horrified in a similar way, the Ottawa Central Liberal Candidate plays with Yasir Naqvi Posting: “Attack.” Attacks.
Liberal candidate Yvan Baker wrote: “It is terrible to use such obsolete and harmful rhetoric of the conservative leader.
“Times changed. The conservative leader is not open.”
The answer was strange and nonsense. Poilievre did not say anything about women, but it would be right. The productivity of women aged decreases. Couples waiting to be financially stable can wait for windows. Although it can only look somewhat disadvantaged, this is just a reality.
Platform
Item content
Advertising 3
Item content
Poilievre talked to the legions of the young Canadians, instead of solving these topics, the Liberals talked to a very real problem in connection with the imaginative war of sex.
By claiming that biological realities are not available, it is not a new thing for progressive. The personality and sexual expression that adds gender and sexual identity from Bill C-16 was added to the forbidden basis for discrimination – in 2017, he played with the idea that the country could be a woman.
I was only one of a few people reproach Then, as a result, it was blacklisted, changed, censored, threatened and protested with the target. However, before that, modern feminism, “they could” be able to do all “women,” A career, motherhood and freedom from the biology of female biology. Nothing stopped them!
This is a wonderful idea and of course women deserve the right to choose how they want to live their lives, it is really a while in the ability to reproduce. A large number of women are often, only the decision will be very long to leave and be disappointed.
Advertising 4
Item content
The fact that those who live in Canada are not “misogynism” to say that children are unfair of children outside no return point. It is a reality that can be unacceptable for Canadians. The focused female productivity “regulates” women’s ovaries “- it is not regulated – it is adjustable female bodies.
Such lies – Men can become women, women can “own them,” biology is only one social structure – do not help women and harm them. And many solutions are equally bad.
Media commentator Sarbjit Kaur wrote In response to Poiliev’s comments: “Do you know what will help women? And families with children? National Day Care Program. Who do you think it brings to Canada?”
But the babies are sent to women and families sent by day care? There are many evidence that babies, babies and young children are in the daytime Harmful effects. And I don’t believe that many women really want.
We do not like to think of ourselves as the animals run by evolutionary biology and still in many ways. This is not a bad thing. We have developed more miraculously thanks to evolution. Despite our best efforts to reject biology and nature, it is often the nature that knows the best. We know that we must take from their mothers when the pumpkets are very young, so why do people think I am so different?
Advertising 5
Item content
The health and well-being of babies are very connected to early closure with their mothers. Yes, it can still live with babies and young children who do not have access to this, but it is not ideal and how people are built. Mothers babies need more than anyone. The mother and baby were quite as if it was quite as though.
I chose not to have my kids because I didn’t want to my life. There were other things I wanted to do more and the kids had never been a desire for me. I am very grateful to have the freedom to make this choice. But for women who want children, are the ideal situation for anyone else for someone else to live for their families in a day for someone else?
Life is full of less pleasant choices, but in this case, the point, the emergency of women’s liberation is not possible to be a mother, but after the children.
Answers who damaged Piliievre are partially deliberate – the same progressive is a try to develop as an opponent of the US President Donald Trump, which is well-known in this world.
Advertising 6
Item content
Julie Dzerowicz, another liberal candidate, wrote in x: “Thank you for your concern, Pierre, but our biological hours are not your business.” Perhaps it does not help women who want to have children and lying to women about biological truths.
As a woman who was never interested in having children, I was never worried about the “Biological Hours”. However, for women who want to build a family and are concerned with Poilievre comments, although liberal policy and rhetoric are a lawyer for women, the best choice for you is worth asking for you.
There is a problem of canadian progressive truth – narrations on the truth prefer consolation narratives and harms the country for years. Yes, sometimes the truth hurts – but it does not mean to talk.
National Writing
Meghan Murphy is a Canadian writer, host same drugs Canadian candidate Podcast and People’s Party in the east of Vancouver.
Recommended from the editor
Item content
