Openai’s logo is on the screen of a mobile phone stored in front of a computer screen showing access to Chatgept.
Michael Dwyer / AP
Hide the title
change title
Michael Dwyer / AP
Wednesday rejected the desire to make the Federal Judge Openai copyrighted New York Times This claims that the technological company exploits the newspaper’s content without permission or without payment.
In order Judge Sydney Stein, deprived of the southern region of the southern region of New York, judge Sydney Stein, allowed the lawsuit to violate the lawsuit of the case.
Stein did not immediately release a comment, but he promised one’s “quick time”.
The decision is the victory of the newspaper connected to other publishers, including forces New York Daily News and the Investigation Report Center, Openai’s popular artificial intelligence service, center to protest the Internet to raise a large amount of information to train Chatgpt.
Lawyer Steven Lieberman, who was in the legal group representing the news, celebrated the verdict.
“We appreciate the opportunity to present the original content of Openai and Microsoft’s original to steal the original content of newspapers in the country,” Lieberman said in a statement to NPR.
Lawyers for New York Times Open copyright protection of paper articles is one of the largest sources of the text that Openai is one of the largest sources used to build Chactegpt and Openai claims to violate copyright laws in the appeal of the newspaper’s journalism.
In a statement on NPR, Openai spokesman Jason Deutrom welcomed that the company’s contractions of this work will be contradicted, lawyers and lawyers for the manufacturer, the use of joint information, cleared our support and the update. “
Openai leaders claimed that the company’s scratches of mass data, including articles TimesProtected under a legal doctrine known as “fair use.”
This allows you to reuse without the permission of the material to study, teaching and commenting in certain cases.
The judge’s sentence means that the suit can now continue to court, but the history of the test was not determined. On both sides of the case, the executors are expected to secretly take place with public practical hearings to resolve the deposits on both sides of the work, including deposits, evidence and other issues.
The legitimate struggle between the world’s most influential news and the leading AI company of the Silicon Valley, it puts a lot to the future of both the news industry and AI tools.
Fear for publishers, while asking, the strong conversations that can quickly summarize news articles, the advertising that can affect the sub-line of industry means visiting frequent news sites.
Suit only Openai and Financial Support, Microsoft, other AI companies also break the Internet to bring up models. For most of the AI ​​Industry, ChatBot response, the development of information found in the open web web, operated under clearly protected information and other AI services, followed by the AI ​​industry’s Openai leadership.
However, the law remains unresolved.
The courts should create a new thing that is a fair use of a copyrighted business “transformative” or comments or comments or the original work. Times This claims that Openai did not belong to how the paper repeats the original report.
Another part of law, “Market replacement” will attract an idea known as “Sunday replacement”, answer, read, read, read, read Times Conversations and newspapers in the website or various marketplaces.
In January, a hearing in New York, lawyers for publishers, claimed questions about the issues covered by Chatgpt TimesChatbot Regurgitated articles Verbatim.
However, Openai’s legal group, news centers, the website of the paper, it turned out that there were special management requests to force many jobs to spit large parts. Most people have been established how the service is not mutually interrelated or to work with ChatBot, the lawyer Joseph Gratz said to work for Openai.
“This is not a system of purchase of this document. It is a great language mode,” said Gratz.
