Hitchcock and Tarantino are coming to mind – a certain film directories – form a genre. Steven Soderbergh, not until it started to do, not until he started to do “small”, and the more budgeted Indie palate cleaners, more Deluxe features entered the habit of directing. It did it as a way to fill out the batteries and remind Movieman should be fun.
The first form of Soderbergh was the “Full Frontal” film “Full Frontal” (2002), a star Hollywood satire or “Bubble”, you can say “Bubble”, “Bubble”, the first day and a dated release. In some way, the original Soderbergh was “Shizopolis”, “Shizopolis”, “Schizopolis” was “Schizchin experimental doodle, prepared by all itself and” I “. ”
At the Toronto Film Festival, I lived breakfast with Soderbergh and started our conversation by returning “Schizopolis” with the “Review” Camera Roots “Review”. Seven years later, he was reborn as a director after “sex, lies and videos.”
This is the small movies for Soderbergh. He joined him in the spirit of his art. He has been working as his own cinematographer for 25 years and sometimes makes his films; This manages him from a man-band that is not the most indicators. Soderbergh, especially in small films, is the master of its domain. But he is also a big fish that floats in a small kinematic pond.
Little movies, so far, have their own Jantri and we have all our favorite fans of Soderbergh. Here is my own accidents: Three best “like” “like girlfriend experience” and “bubble”; “Side effects,” “Let’s let the laundry” and “let all let them speak”; “Full Frontal,” “Haywire,” and “Beings” are a breeze. In general, it is not a bad track record. The current film of Soderbergh is like a true-romance John Le Carré, a real-romance John Le Carré, which is married to a very popular “black bag”, but because it is a “small” soderbergh movie and maybe a messenger apotheosis. In terms of quality, I would place it at the top of the Soderbergh-Little-movie pyramid. I do not think that it intends to do something better.
But this is a question. For Soderbergh, the correcting small movies turns himself in a way to not be smart and centralized … The reason for almost none of these movies, the process of doing this is more important to Soderbergh, a little forested allen in the comedy-A-year stage. There are less. Soderbergh movies are good and sometimes alive, but I would say it was a very long time. Almost every movie is now one genre the film. Sorry, but this is very safe.
Remember 25 years ago, Soderbergh did “Traffic”? It was a deep drama on the drug war and if no one expect a massive shot, who he could – who did it get known? the quality. (This is $ 124 million.) We are now living in a different film world. Soderbergh, who thinks the post-covig sequence to the triller of high prescriptient 2011, is a director with goods to get out of the bunker, “infection”. Recently, many movies took them into great “big swings.” But really came time for Steven Soderbergh for a great swing. He is a master and is very late in the game for him. He once again, he is not only a higher puzzle manufacturer, but by making a movie by making a movie that reads the air around us again shows someone who can reconstruct adults to the movie theaters.
