Stroke in Gilbert Roso’s Court. 16 women who testified against him said that the former producer was ready to give up their rights to allow all the questions they wanted, regardless of the article of myths and stereotypes.
Me Bruce Johnston, who represents the nine demands that followed the Gilbert Roson for sexual harassment and harassment, will present a request to reject the appeal this Friday.
A call, limiting the questions of protection on March 7, March 7, which is the “responsible damage” of Mr Rozo, was greeted by Judge Martin Vauclair,
To catch? Mr Rozo’s lawyers said they refused to provide similar facts of claims and witnesses. Why? In fact, in myth and stereotypes, the appellate court said that the appellate court would want to “light” in the interpretation of Article 2858.1. The first time the new law is applied.
A bench of three judges from the appeal must decide on the demand for a rich demand as soon as possible on March 24.
If the Court of Appeal welcomes the applicants’ request – and witnesses of similar facts – the trial will restore the normal course to refuse the rights. If the Court of Appeal rejects the request, the appeal will be heard as soon as possible in the next June (in which case the next July or August will be decided).
In the last case, Judge Chahantal Tremblay wants to continue in March with the analogy of myths and stereotypes in March. However, Mr. Rozo’s lawyers presented a suspension request to intervene in the court until he did not decide to the Court of Appeal.
To date, all the desires and witnesses of similar facts have been interviewed and counter-examined (except for non-counter-examined Véronique Moreau). Therefore, there is evidence of the defense, which does not want to start missions at this stage.
It should be noted that Mr. Rozon challenged the Constitution of Article 2858.1 in Mir and Stereootypes on stereotypes, as of December 4, in the same year in Article 2926.1 for 30 years in 2020. 2926.1.
