Federal representatives stressed the international day of international day by fighting the intolerance of Canadians to the Muslim communities of the country on Saturday. However, Canadian Muslims claim that the government defending civil rights and efforts to oppose the government’s hate rising.
Caucasan Special Representative of Canada, who is responsible for the fight against Islamophobia, said that Muslims in the country face systematic obstacles to the country’s violence and discrimination. Islamophobia, it manifests itself in racism, stereotypes and hostility.
“In addition to motivating the individual movements of racial intolerance and profiling, Islamophobia can cause these people to evaluate and treat these people as a more important danger for security and society.”
Photo Adrian Wyld, Canadian Press Archives
Amira Elghawaby, Canadian Special Representative is responsible for the fight against Islamophobia
Mmy Elghawaby said that the federal government strengthened Ottawa’s support for Ottawa’s Canadian Community Security Program and Canadian Racism Strategy, escalating.
Chief Officer Mary Simon, a statement in a statement on Saturday, asked Canadians to oppose the sectarianism. “Whether there are rape or hate words on the Internet, the growth of hostility against Muslims is not only the victim and destructive and destructive for their families, but also combined as a country,” said Mr.my Simon.
However, the Canadian Muslim Forum says you should go further. In an interview, President Samer Majzoub, the group’s president Samer Majzoub, Ottawa’s “hate prestige and stronger interventions and stronger interventions and stronger interventions and stronger interventions.
The forum also requires the financing of federal and provincial governments in mosques, to eliminate system discrimination within the Sensitivity and government agencies in schools and employment.
Mr. Majzoub Bill 21 – As teachers and police, the laws of the state sector are religious symbols in the workplace, the law of the state of the state that accepts the law as an example of persons written in the law.
In January, the Supreme Court of Canada, it was discussed by several groups and said it was a legal problem with the score. The federal government has submitted the opinion of the intervention in this case to defend religion freedom.
