This First Room by The Nation Court of Justice (SCJN) set it People who dedicate themselves to the house give their right to financial compensationEven and when it was done by marriage Separate goods And in some cases, Features are sold.
While solving the amparo, the ministers signed their research whether referees His wife is for sale or gift To avoid compatible with Compensation commitmentAnd in this case, the amount of goods sold, must be added to the percentage of compensation.
Based divorce test Guanajuato
The Supreme Justice Court of Justice knew a claim from the divorce court in the case of the court GuanajuatoHe claimed that his wife, who dedicated himself to his homes and daughters, dedicated to its condition and paid work, the paid for financial compensation.
The jurisdiction of the first and second cases were sentenced to paying an economic compensation for 40% of the value of all assets to be reached during the reliability of marriage.
You can also be interested: Salinas Prevents SCJN Leniya Batresin Amparo in PLIEGO
Of course, the defendant encouraged the amparo judgment that gave him a wife Collective After appreciating this, knowledge for the amount of economic compensation Article 342 by Civil code For the province of Guanajuato, the assets of those who have only spouses of spouses should be taken into account when dictating divorce.
He disagreed with this decision, applied for a review, the reason for this, claimed that the economic compensation was quantitative, the owner of the owner’s wife or the intention to prevent compensation.
Assets only with spouse: SCJN should be thought
His government reflects the reflection of this by deciding the financial compensation specified in the first SCJN room Article 342to determine as a rule and its amount, Only the goods of his wife counted should be considered This is dedicated to a conditional and economic paid to work in the ordinary and economic and economic paid sentence.
This decision, economic compensation, as a compensation mechanism – trying to compensate the unbelievers they stayed when divorce is commanded. In addition, decisions are made in connection with the family heritage, solidarity and mutual aid, solidarity and mutual assistance, the decisions made or decisions made to contribute to the family legislation, or to contribute to their protection.
The judge will analyze the analysis of considerations that support the return of the assets to return the return of a spouse’s capital: SCJN
However, according to the equality and collapse of the Norman’s interpretation, the rights of the debtor, as a liability for the migration, the rights of the debtor, or the obligation of legal acts were accepted or accepted by the simulation of the property or confirmation of the liability simulation of the property or confirmation of the liability of the ownership of the obligation or assisted by mutual agreement they must analyze; Or if it is appropriate, it is done in this unusual manner in this unusual manner in an impact on the purpose of protecting or enriching their inheritance.
Thus, taking into account this situation, it is due to the fact that the context of whether the context is developed to ensure that the context of the disrupted or forgiveness is not affected by the required obligations, and all measures should be evaluated and not all measures are taken.
You can also be interested: Senate confirms the administrative simplification of the President
“The judge must solve the assets of his spouses”
In this way, the first camera, the fund was dedicated to the financial compensation related to financial compensation, “goods owned by the owner of the Arabs”, but the owner was committed or presented by the owner to comply with the possibility of the opportunity to pay the opportunity to pay the opportunity to spend the opportunity.
According to the above, the first camera canceled the decision and returned the issue Collective to release the other one attached to the reasons specified.
Costly
