Colorado Democrats can seriously restrict separating magazines: NPR

Denver – Weapons sellers and owners in Colorado will soon be subject to the laws of the most restrictive weapon control in the country.

MPs in the State are corrected give a measure This would be illegal to use allocating ammunition magazines, except several. By doing so, you would be illegal to buy and produce extensive firearms models, including rifles, shotguns, pistols and some shotguns.

Disconnected magazines are devices that allow fires to re-download and load fires faster. Without it, they will have to load gun users one by one by one.

The bill says the legislation of the legislation is necessary to restrict the damage caused during mass shooting.

Shooting in Colorado

Colorado has a mass shooting history that belongs to the Columbine High School in 1999. Then, in 2012, when an armed person uses a hundred-staged separating magazines to shoot at the filmgoers of an armed person in Auroroers.

Tom Sullivan’s son Alex was one of the dozens of people killed in this shoot.

“If Alex had two seconds, maybe he could be behind the seat, maybe something else could happen in front of him. Maybe today will still be here,” Sullivan said.

The shooting of the Aurora cinema was a reason for a reason, and took a law that banned magazines from fifteen rounds more than ten years ago.

However, since then, two more important shots in Colorado – in 2021 and in a Boulder supermarket in the club Q, a year later in Colorado springs in Colorado-plus night club. Both include high-capacity cellular magazines.

On March 28, 2021, the Colorado State Colorado, Denver, Colorado in Colorado State Capitol flies.

Michael Caglo / Getty Images

Hide the title

change title

Michael Caglo / Getty Images

Now Sullivan is now a democratic state senator, behind the final proposal, and it is already framed to strengthen the ban on high potential magazines without affecting the own owner.

“It is for the next person who is worried about the next purchase and this is worried about or from there,” Sullivan says. “When that person goes to a local weapon shop or large box store, they will receive something with an additional magazine.”

Other states already have magazine restrictions. In CaliforniaMagazines are likely to be corrected, but the locking mechanism can still be removed in a few minutes with simple tools. In New YorkThey are considered one of the features that determine the illegal attack weapons in the state.

Colorado legislation will be further and demanded that the magazines will be alloy, welded or a strong epoxy weapon.

You need to compromise

The majority of Democrats in the legislation support measures, but they had to make some concessions to buy a democratic government.

One compromise frees from several ONE firearms used for hunting quickly. The other allows people to receive a private permission, taking a special permission by receiving a consent of local Ignovation, taking security training twelve hours.

Other changes in the law will create a process to review the permitting applications of the Sheriffs, and demand the annual transparency reports on the cost of the bill and postpone the date of entry into force until 2026.

A California fixed magazine conversion set built for restrictive states built for restrictive states, California, California, Calif’da Orange County Fairgroads in the Western Weapon Show is installed for a rifle installed for a rifle

Patrick T. Fallon / AFP through Getty Images

Hide the title

change title

Patrick T. Fallon / AFP through Getty Images

“Colorado can really be a true security test for civilian firearms,” ​​said Daniel Webster, Daniel Webster, who studied state weapons laws at Johns Hopkins University. He says that although these changes, the most rigid weapon in the country may be due to property laws.

In addition, Colorado, which has a deep-rooted weapon culture, offers such a weapon regulation, also offers such a weapon regulation. “It will be a statement that you can still protect your second adjustment rights to be able to get firearms for both sports and defense, but we admit that it will be a more serious process to make sure that human firearms are.”

Opposition

One of the largest critics of the bill is the state’s weapons sellers.

Brian Clark, Bristlecone shooting, Lakewood, Colorado, Denver, outside Denver, Bristlecone shooting and retailing center in Colorado outside, Bristlecone Shooting and Retail Center in Colorado. “The Colorado legislature has been able to definitely our right to our rights and living.”

In this case, Colorado passed than many laws The arms ownership restricts the rights. However, the final proposal goes more than any of the following, and many gunshield owners claim to dismiss them.

Clark, especially when it comes to rifles and shotguns, expresses a significant part of an important part of the inventory overnight.

“For our long arms inventory, 60-75% of the weapons we sold would be affected.”

This is one of the most vendors and one of the most popular models in the United States: AR-15.

Other critics, including the Republican MPs, said that the event will have a clear constitution. For weapons security and moms requirement, the eternet supports the bill on one side. The National Rifle Association and other groups are lobbying against it.

The law has a recent legislative voice to pass through the extensive support of the democratic majority.

Now there may be a clear way to the finish line in Colorado, but even if it enters the law, the court will face problems.