The Prophet, the announcing Prophet ‘Celebrated the’ victory ‘on Wednesday.
The self-proclaimed prophet and smuggled shepherd bushy noted the reduction of accusations belonging to God.
On Wednesday, the main resident of Malavi’s Master’s Court demanded the extradition of South Africa.
The couple is left out of prison waiting for an application in the Supreme Court.
The Bushy celebrates
Bushiri took the extradition request to social media to mark the reduction of three charges.
“As you know, we faced 13 incidents in court. But God has caused 10 of these cases to the lack of evidence of endless wisdom and power.”
Also read: will the shepherd rewrite Bushy? Here’s what the Minister of Justice says
However, the Ministry of Justice and the Constitutional Development Bushiri faced at least six charges.
They include breaches, financial advice and intermediary services and intermediary services, banking act, the Civil Aviation Act and the Civil Aviation Act and the Immigration Act.
The couple fled Malavi in ​​November 2020, and the Pretoria Central Master’s Court fled to the Pretoria Central Master’s Court.
At this time, Bushiri asked for “security and security issues for their actions.
“There were clear and open attempts to be my own, my wife and family were killed. Despite several attempts to report to the authorities, there was never a state protection,” he said.
“We came to a conclusion that my wife and I have been prosecuted in the Republic of South Africa since 2015 and are not tried.
Also, read: Malawi Court South Africa’s Shepherd Bushiri and Wife Extradition Extradition
“In 2018, today, today, today and this, and how many shocks are those who have researched several lawsuits, and those who have the usurpation and trial.
“It is clear that there can never be independence and impartiality. This is completely open revenge acts.”
Bushiris continues to fight
After the government on Wednesday, Bushiri’s intention was to apply.
“There are only three cases, and we were allowed to remain in the Supreme Court of Malawi. This is a great victory and we have given all the glory to God,” he said.
Malawi’s Prosecutor General, Thany-Waxeyea, welcome, welcomes the court’s decision.
“I think that in this case, I know that the role of power is neutral. Of course, we welcome the decision of the courts,” Cakaka-Nyıren said on Thursday, Newzroom.
Read: Escape pastorum bushyi and at least the alleged landscapes that were washed r73m
He noted that there is no reason to reject the couple of the Court of Malawa.
“He will remain in exchange for collateral until the Supreme Court completed. The Supreme Court may decide whether the collateral should be canceled or not.
“I understand that so far it can be very difficult to say that the state could not take hostage. Some of the basic principles in the hostage, where there are suspects, in this case, in this case, in this situation, in this case, there are connections outside the country.
“So he can say that there is nothing to do or any assets outside the country. Of course, only the connection is South Africa, where he ran.”
Can the charges be restored?
Chakaka-Nyıren, South Africa’s intention to accuse Bushi’s extradition was said to be accused of the extradition charges, which will need the consent of the Malav government.
“In addition to the other charges against the accusations of South Africa, other charges, the South African government will seek to judge these accusations from the Malawia government. Only these three or four charges can be expanded to say that you cannot judge me with other charges,” said Mr. Bushiri’s consent. “
Also, read: Police, Busyri’s lawyers for corruption, say fears
Despite the decision of the lower court in front of Bushiris, the Prosecutor General expects to appeal to the Supreme Court. But he said he did not expect the future process to last longer than the previous time.
“We will not wait for these processes to postpone, because in other processes, we have heard the evidence of preliminary applications and presentations and decisions. In this case, there will be only one hearing, even if the Supreme Court applies to the court.”
