I Hate to sound like a prepper but I’m obliged to admit that the meal collection within the last month. I think you have to do the same thing if you can. 25 kg of rice, 15 kg dried peas, 15 kg of bread flour, shapatio flour, 5 kg of oatmeal, six-liter vegetable oil, some hazelnuts and dried fruit. This represents the supply of about two months with the vegetables we grow.
I hope that the chances of using our congestion are small. But we can no longer need this insurance. It’s strange as it can sound, I see this harvest. Construction of reserves reduces the request in the crisis when the meal is abundant. Community reserves and endurance planning would still be better. But I don’t expect.
Research My Book RegenezI learned the extraordinary reliability of the nations that brought food in the United States. Almost 60% Calories grown by farmers Take the picture of wheat, rice, corn and soybeans. Like The nations polarized Production of super-exporters and super importers and exports focused on a high level in a handful of land. USA Among the largest exporters one All four commodities.
The deliberate effort is impossible to cut the UK. But this is not a matter. The issue is that Donald Trump’s antics trigger sudden global failure in the food system. Intermediate risks, programs include military attacks on the throats and channels large volume of food transmissionand the collapse of one of the corporate meal giants too large to fail.
Trump will also aggravate environmental blows. Collection “Whiplash effect” – Mild weather changing with drought and floods – is one of the factors that can cause Synchronized product deficiency in basic growing areas.
Since 2015 a number one dams in Scientific press They warned the global food system Structural problems It is similar to those who harm the global financial system before 2008. There is one rapidly diversityOther key elements of spare and systematic sustainability. The food system shows “Flicking” marks: Fluctuations in output values ​​(such as commodity prices) The collapse of this head. Governments giving the future money and prevented the financial collapse in 2008. They cannot prevent the collapse of the food system by giving the future meal.
Since then, warnings make rich only intensified. Some governments listened to them. ChineseJapan, Switzerland and Norwegian Invest in grain reserves. Food reserves are not only insured against disaster, but can be used as a buffer to prevent Variable prices.
When asked the British government, when asked if there were strategic food reserves, he emptied my question. When I pressed, “We do not express relations with national security.” This is an unhappy excuse. Other governments inform their peoples on this issue, trust and tranquility. Even Boris Johnson’s regime also responded to my question in 2020. The answer was not “No”, and I doubt that this ridiculous obfuscation remains “no” today.
As a National Preparatory Commission, this Gave information about food security in the UK Last month, “If the lack of politics, this is a risky strategy.” It is a risky strategy. “His sheet reveals consecutive leaders to take care of the comications of consistent governments or to take care of the issue seriously. They rounded at every opportunity to increase the durability of the food system. Instead of developing a security plan, the government, on-time logistics, is a brand confidence in the trade sector, which has severe risk.
Reserves are necessary, but not enough to create enough resilience. Taking into account that food cannot be the same as food safety (with some respect as global trade) Protects us from a lack of local product) Here are some steps where the government can buy.
Britain produces plenty of grains, but very few people feed. You can be aware of Preposterous cosmetic standards These supermarkets apply to fruit and vegetable growers. You can also be less aware that mills and other processors apply hard standards. We can make bread from a wide range to show an example. However, as a farmer explains to me, mills require “common consistency”. Each bread must be the same, so each load of each cargo must match the features. The content of a protein, which is more than 12%, a hagberg and 15% water content that is above 300. If you miss any of this, milling is disqualified as wheat and goes to animal feed instead and get a lower price. They do not compromise. They do not accept the proposals. “It can relieve such standards and give more food for human consumption.
Can reduce animal products we eat larger extent. A plant-based diet on a global scale 76% require less soil than the current average diet. There are 85% of our farmers used to feed cattle. Sheep that most people dream of only in the grass Hundreds of thousands of tons Additional grains and fatty items.
To reduce livestock consumption, a government strategy can ensure both the strength and environmental sustainability of the food system incredibly productive mountains Can be re-edited. The government accelerates something good Approval of alternatives. Sensitive fermentation can increase our production of radically reduced protein, but also fertilizer and fertilizer imports.
If the change of food imports means increased increase in increased fertilizer imports, less for durability The UK remains a lot depending on. We should try to maintain high productivity with fewer access. If we understand the soil better, we were able to inform biology (interesting interaction between plant and germs) and less information to chemo. Had Some recent improvementsHowever, soil science woe remains behind.
Governments should break the corporate monopolies: Anti-trust laws should be strong and the intellectual property rights must be weak. They must participate in making a decision Taiwan did when faced with crises. Everyone, including people in poverty, should always take a good nourishing task. If you are currently hitting the crisis, you are filled. Sorry, I was hungry.
Our provisions are currently inbox and assembled. They followed some of my friends and the suit of my neighbors. But we do this in knowledge that individual action is never. Not everyone is safe, especially until those with the greatest need. My full shelves do not satisfy me. You do not have to come to this.
