- The book of “careless people”, the Book of the former Meta employee, the New York Times did the number 1 on the bestseller list.
- Meta, author, Sarah Wynn-Williams, tried to prevent the book legally.
- Siri What does the “Streisand Effect” mean?
Sarah Wynn-Williams has published a memory of the time in global politics, which is not opened in a deep form of society and managers.
Before releasing March 11, Meta moved urgently with an arbitration. The judge decided that Winn-Williams violated the company’s unvoial agreement and should not be stopped in promoting the book. (Publisher pointed out that the judge did not affect it, and the book was currently on sale.)
I assumed the return of the methane last week: I turned off a new wave of a new title and drew more attention. Come, who wouldn’t like to check The book does not want to read Mark Zuckerberg?
My theory has confidence since then. The book just made the number 1 debut New York Times list of bestseller to be non-fiction. He also occupies the fifth place in Amazon’s bestseller list.
Earlier, before the referee, Pranav Dixit met with Wynn-Williams. It does not seem to be interviewed since then.
Typically, non-fiction books are announced in advance, more years, and reviews are sent for more time than treatment. This reveals sharply to exist – declared a week before release. However, the incredibly short presentation window did not hurt the sale.
I must note here that the book is not contradictory (I think it is known). Meta rejected his contents in an official statement as a workman who was fired for “toxic behavior” and poor performance. Meta, at the same time, took into account the company’s latest changes to check on its platforms, he lost in anyone (he said.
Andrew Bosworth, Meta CTO, said on the subjects The book is “full of lies. The words of the words did not happen.” Another current and old meta workers took place in the social media where the book does not reflect the meta. Katie Harbath Katie Harbath, coinciding with Wynn-Williams and some things that occur in the 2011-2017 period, wrote a blog post How influences in the inaccuracies that violate the larger point of it. He wrote:
However, when the facts are wrong, the results of people are also flawed. The company’s real failures deserve to check. Exaggeration, shortcomings and distortions are muddy only in conversation.
However, a meta worker, who has at least one past former COMMS, supported the book that felt the book, which is committed to his experience.
In my opinion I read the book, I promise that both colleagues who read the book will be ten years ago and receive different answers. In a memory written years later, yes, details and conversations can be wrong.
But it’s something for the trees. The most damaged moments in the book were dedicated to the website (Nobody in the Earth, despite the fact that no one is filled with the book “Old News”, and some of them are very serious. We know that we all know. Book offers It is an idea in the rooms where these decisions are made. This is attractive.
The attempt to embrace the book by applying an unvelieved paragraph of Meta was one of these mistakes? Well, I guess we can soon argue this in society notes.
