Bill geyts enjoying the release of the latest book Fawning profiles “Other technological billionaires” such as Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg, and all the last turns are made of the “other technological billionaires”. While not able to use political distribution technology, the past and present with the past and present, with the past and present, it is a good thing that luck is a good thing that happens to be a good thing.
This philosophy was the first time in 1889, Stead Magnate Carnegie, one of the richest Americans in history, called the title of “Wealth Gospel”. The reaction to the progressive feeling of Carnegie’s day was to claim that the state’s concentration is useful for society, efficiency and economic growth, which also provides another social good by charity. Thousands of libraries are worth the price of thousands of tough treatment for the violation of employees and the environment.
Familiar sound? Today’s technological leaders provide the same logic as the basis for the legitimacy and inequality of their fortunes. Prestigious enterprise capitalist Marc Andreessen, for example, expresses it clearly “strike a bargain“He believes that it exists between Silicone Valley and society, the technological moguls must give a significant freedom to create wealth through the innovations created, and eventually the effects of any negative society or environment will result in future generosity.
Andreessen Joe Biden is the right compact violation and other technological leaders “to support and support your friend Donald Trump.
However, the PaceTter is the PaceTter, despite the fact that all philanthropists followed by Neo-Carnegie Important criticism of this model. I strain the views of Carnegie so that in Harvard Kennedy School, when a class in Harvard Kennedy school, we read the “Bible” in the first session Not to do. It is an open guide to both the rights and the right person and the right person, the right person, the carniger, and the experiment, and a special guide to democracy to determine the problematic problem and violates democracy in the hands of democracy.
Like Carnegie, the beginning of the charity of the doors, significant criticism of work experience and the source of the source of the wealth. Twenty-five years ago, Microsoft was sued by the US government for Internet Explorer with other products against competition. When Videos of the crash of doors for work Society was done, made an important shot in the image. He encountered as picturesque and arrogant, refused to deny the concept of common words by refusing to admit key facts anxiety and supportand often distracting accountability.
He was known as the other technological moguls “cybribal“Like Carnegie, as a philanthropist, today Gates Foundation has a very public examination today as they come to see as a way to restore the reputation. More than 100 million life saved.
But like Carnegie, the gatein work also reflects the ideology of criticism for a selective focus and “the best of billionaires”. Carnegie’s construction libraries and museums are interested in the interests, not the needs of the communities they want to serve, reflect their biases and priorities. At the same time, employees and immigrant communities suffering from work experience often showed very little access or interest in these institutions and would benefit more than labor protection, housing or public health infrastructure.
Geyts Fondunun bəzi tanınmış uğursuzluqları, həmçinin, güclü nəticələr, nəticədə mübahisəli nəticələr verən, demokratik həllər, demokratik həllər, demokratik həllər, demokratik həllər, demokratik həllər, demokratik həllər deyil, qapıların öz səs-küylü maraqlarını əks etdirən əsas imperiya üslubunu təsvir edir.
Foundation Education reform efforts He disregarded teacher experience and impaired the unequacy for standard testing and charter schools in the United States. In Africa, industrial agricultural and genetic modified plants have shown that these activities show these activities against the desires of local farmers, which are often durable, small-scale agriculture and a number of reports did not provide food safety. Similarly, doors Notice to resolve climate change The climate is on suspicious technologies such as direct air capture and geologies, which require extensive financial support, rather than resolving the reduction solutions for the needs of justice justice.
Many of my students working in non-commercial areas reflect a non-profit view of the Foundation to the personal interests of the doors and a difficult engineering approach to solve the problem of ignoring the cultural, social and historical context forming more human behavior. This is seen as the root cause of education reform. In order to educate effectiveness and detail the establishment of tracking measures, the stress of teachers, and contributed to the “Teaching”, unlike more learning.
This over-information approach is also closely following with an effective altruism (EA) with a philosophy that has a wide resonance between Tech-Elite. EA protects ethical decisions a serious utilitarian logic and treat problems such as more optimization puzzles than complex moral or social dilemmas. For example, the metric “quality adjustable years” is aimed at appreciating the results of charitable based on, such measures devaluate any approach to an approach that does not benefit the disabled and neat expenses.
The disgraced crypto entrepreneur Sam was a bankman-Fried effective altruist and has elon musk described EA as a “close match” for its own personal philosophy.
The Hubris level, exhibited by Geyts, Musk and Andreessen, has not been seen since the cycle of jewelry. But we can not forget that this 19th century is a reason to recognize the “bandit barons” of the industrialist.
With the day of Carnegie, it appears in the current time, changed the ways in the industry, communications and transport technologies, and at the same time, the extreme income inequality and ultraric entrepreneurs raised a new class of entrepreneurs. There was also an important decline in political gridlock and immigration. Finally, the gilded age was widespread and caused a progressive period of systemic injustice.
But today will it create enough speeds for a fundamental sliding of climate change, economic inequality, social health problems and resources? During the second Trump Office, the chairman of the newly elected Democratic National Committee, as the head of Ken Martin, could be attractive to the doors and “good billionaires” cohort recently offered. However, if a person will not be able to ask how we cannot collect such a wealth, there will be no progressive period in the 21st century.
