- Ben & Jerry’s parent company, Unilever, CEO, accused the documents of the court.
- Continuing Ben & Jerry’s suit against UNILVER has accused him of his new dehydration.
- Lawyers for Ben & Jerry are inseparable by attracting the phrase brand, customers.
According to the new court documents of the ice cream brand Ben & Jerry, the CEO accused the unilever of the main executive.
Eliminating CEO David Stever, the lawyers for “Silence” for Ben & Jerry, in the southern district of New York, the lawyers in the southern district of New York, the two lawyers in the southern district, the two-year-old workers were said to have an action.
Unilever, Ben & Jerry’s staff has repeatedly, including CEO David Stever, Ben & Jerry’s efforts to silence the social mission is to remove Mr. Stever’s social mission and basic brand integrity. “
Unilever informed the independent board of Ben & Jerry, who managed his social brand and mission on March 3, said that it would be more substituted.
Steth served as the company’s CEO of May 2023, providing for more than 2023 after preparing the ranks of decades.
Stever’s removal was not immediately clear if completed fully. Ben & Jerry’s lawyers were allegedly violations in the approved process Eliminate the executors and follow the unit of the courts “CEO destination and lifting procedure.”
In response to the desire to comment, Unilever Ben & Jerry’nin Ben & Jerry’s decisions on the appointment and removal of Ben & Jerry’s General Director will be made by Unilever after getting acquainted with the independent board and discussion. “
“Unfortunately, despite the reciprocal attempts to attract the board and watch the right process, we are disappointed because the Career Conversation is made public. B & J We hope that the independent board will be engaged in the original, agreed process,” he said.
Ben & Jerry did not respond immediately to a request for comment.
Unilever received Ben & Jerry for $ 326 million in 2000. However, relations recently tense for political issues. For example, in 2021, the ice cream company tried to stop selling in Israeli settlements in the West Bank.
Ben & Jerry’s court, allegedly to court in November, accused the court of silencing his political statements about the Gaza war. Tuesday’s claim is part of this claim.
In social media accounts, progressive social justice ideals, including Ben & Jerry’s voting rights, LGBTQ and BITC rights, immigrant and immigrant rights. The action said that Ben & Jerry’s DNA and Customers are involved in Ben & Jerry “and the lawyers of the DNA” and lawyers allegedly.
“As a result, the company’s social activity, or the action of compromising the public, Ben & Jerry causes real, calculated and significant financial and influential damage,” he said.
March 19, 2025 – Updated to enter comments from the unilever sent after this story is published.
