- Former employees of a lithium-tech starting, gave to the company to the company, claiming to be poisonous chemicals.
- Lilac solutions, which are the bank transmission by Bill Gates, calculated for trading secret violations.
- A lawyer for the former employees, Lilac’s suit said that he was “pressure tactics to scare.”
Four former employees of the start of the lithium Banred by Bill Gates’ Climate Investment Company He sued the company, accused of “carelessness”, which exposes the sick and injured poisonous chemicals.
Former workers in Lilac Solutions are said in a 60-page court that the weak ventilated Oakland, California, “extreme braces” about dangerous dust and smoke “extreme braces”. “
Former employees of former workers who opposed the former workers in late January, the starting secrets of the beginning were withdrawn in the lawsuit of the starting secrets of the beginning through public court documents.
Gates’s climate investment company has developed a new technology to produce an important material in electricity batteries, which is more than $ 165 million, which led by hidden energy companies.
Gates are not in person with Lithium. Its investment firm is not said in the case of the former employees.
Previous Business Insider Revier Fiters use the law of trade secrets as a legal strategy against employees who accuse companies wrong.
Nick Yasman, a lawyer, a lawyer, who represented former workers, said that Lilac’s meter was “pressure tactics to intimidate” to support the customers of the meter and said.
No Lilac spokesman, however, “the company’s allegations are completely indecent,” he said.
“Lilac solutions will revive themselves and employees in this court and are confident that the legal process will be aware of these baseless allegations from these baseless allegations,” he said. “Our focus continues to deliver a faster, cheaper, cheaper, cheaper and more clean industry manufacturing in the demand of growing industry.”
Lilac ‘sacrificed human health,’ he said
Former employees claim against Lilac, the company claims the “human health and safety.” “
Claimant Michael Mitchell, Xiry Crawford, Tyler Echevarria and Anthony McCune, Lilac’s Oank Exchange “Beads”, Lithium used in the production of Britium, in the end of November, it is alleged to have given the Alameda County Superior Court.
“Chemical” such as “chemical” such as “chemical” such as “chemical chemical” such as “chemical chemical”, such as “chemical chemical”, such as “chemical chemical”, such as IXM. “
“Although the merger can be a complex material combined with a small exposure level, the significant exposure of the combination can lead to a high level of chemical 1 in human blood. “The chemical concentration of chemicals in the bloodstream can lead to chemical 1 poisoning, which is a poisonous situation that causes chemicals or chronic exposure.”
Bidders reserved the “ink a” in torn bags, which are “careless” to the storage floor of Lilac, allow the particles to escape into the air.
The test results claim that the former employees are actively exposed to the “every workday to be at a high level of high levels.”
Before working in Lilac, the lawsuit said the plaintiffs are physically healthy. After society and leave, severe respiratory pains, coughs, difficulty in breathing, abnormal stomach pains, nervous systems, severe insomnia, anxiety and depression, including severe insomnia, anxiety and depression.
The bidders say that in 2021, in 2024, “they are regularly provided on the threat of the materials they work in the” regular “regularly provided with minimal protective equipment.”
Former workers in the complaint, the physical injuries caused a significant increase in Lilac’s “many toxic chemicals.”
Former workers, tables and jobs are constantly covered with chemical dust and are covered with smoke and “toxicity is inevitable.”
In January 2021 and 2024, employees complained about the “non-rude” ventilation system in the warehouse.
“Despite the complaints of the plaintiffs, Lilac did not take any measures to increase ventilation and air purity to January 2024, after the termination of the bidders.
On January 16, 2024, the workers were informed about the end and said that this was the result of the “reduction of force.”
Complaints of the bidder’s plaintiff’s health and safety and safety of the bidders, “complaints of complaints of complaints” “
The court claims the violations of the California Labor Code, the whistlebar, negligence and discrimination.
“This is a mischief,” Yasman, “said people who are the most common people who complain.
After their fathers, the bidders filed the complaints of Lilac with the California Labor Commissioner Commission and the State Safety and Health Department, as a result of four quotations of Lilac.
Lilac claims that former workers violate privacy agreements
Lilac, against January 31, the counter was called the court documents by calling “the open and deliberate misconception of trade secrets” in court.
Former workers, Lilac’s claim: “Lilac uses to produce certain ceramic beads in Lilac to obtain trade secret information related to chemicals and processes.”
This is a process that “his rivals do,” or that he can do, “or lilac.
The alleged lawsuit, the alleged lawsuit, the so-called “IX beads” of the former employees were not allowed to be allowed to disclose anyone in the high confidentiality and lilac. “
Lilac claims that the company’s “company” “The company” “continues to be incontinent” “” “the company” “” The company “” “continues to be incontinent.”
His claim, designing the legal appeal of the former employees, the company’s trial, “Chemical 1”, which describes “the most important chemical in the production of IX Beads”, he said.
Yashan, during a report with Bi, defended the trade secrets that Lilac’s company could be found on its website or openly presented.
The lawyer and his team, California, raised a special motion to hold the work under the anti-Slapp law, which is designed to restrict the right to curb and protect free speech rights.
