(Ottawa) Analysis of the Canadian Liberal Party hit the imagination. On a map showing Canada and the United States, we saw that the black line representing the border between the two countries was deleted.
“As we discussed this free trade agreement, there is a line I want to change,” the experimenter carrying the glasses sitting in front of his interlocutor begins to use the period at the end of his pen.
1988 was in the period of federal elections. The campaign has become a referendum on a free trade agreement by the progressive-conservative government of Brian Mulrononey and Ronald Reagan, between Canada and the United States.
John Turner’s liberals were campaigned against this commercial agreement as NPD. The two parties claimed that such an economic rapprochement in the United States was risking Canada’s sovereignty. The water, cultural and health system was likely to control the Americans, and liberal soldiers also said.
This campaign raised the passions. Especially for the country’s regions are divided. The state of Ontario was against the agreement. Was in favor of Quebec and Alberta. Businessmen confirm the agreement. Unions rejected it by predicting economic massacres.
However, in November 1988, the Multroney government in November 1988, the majority of the seats in the Commons House won the bet. There was a mandate to confirm the free trade agreement with the United States. After the election campaign, the majority of Canadians said yes to the adventure of unprecedented economic rapprochement with the South neighbor.
In almost 40 years, tons of tons, both in Canada and the United States in the United States. Especially Donald Trump changed since his return to the White House.
The American president has multiplied on all Canadian products that can create a painful decline in the country – customs duties on customs duties. Continues to claim the desire to add in Canada to make 51ste The state. He even goes to doubt the line between the two countries arising from the 1908 contract. Its untimely expressions of Canadians irritate the highest point.
Conclusion: The future of Canada-American relations will be in the center of the next election campaign that may begin in ten days. This question will still raise passions in the context of different reasons, as in 1988 and in a different geopolitical context.
Former Prime Minister Jean Charest was the minister in the Multroney Government during the 1988 election campaign. This remembers the historical war yesterday.
“In 1988, the country was divided,” he said in an interview Press This week.
“Today, the country has not been divided against Trump. In fact, it is unanimous. Everyone says that you need to find the best person to face,” he said.
He added that Canadian voters are looking for the best strategy not only to maintain the sovereignty of Canada but also to ensure the economic future.
“We are now in a broken world. We will never return to whatever previous. It will be a campaign to go quickly. The last time the Canadians were mobilized in 1995 referendum campaigns.”
Another study broadcast by Angus Reid this week, the vast majority of Canadians (90%) show that the United States is a majority of one that is against the country’s illihon. Talking about this opinion, these ideas believe in 54% of Donald Trump.
“People are hanging on the street. They are mobilized. And every day, the patriotism is very inspiring. But what does it do,” but what does it do, “but what does it do,” but what does both strong and weak. “
According to him, “Re-thinking the Canadian state” and this is a reflection of the fact that the federal-professional relations, the country’s taxes and the rules should be caused by the country of Canada, Europe in the world.
Undoubtedly, the Canadian nationalism will be on the top during the next election campaign. Negotiations against Trump will also be common. “Masters with Us”, a new liberal chief of us is repeated with Mark Carney. “Canada Initially” said the Pierre Hairyvre leader of the Conservative Party since the last fall.
NPD leader Jagmeet Singh, Canadian replica should go to the G7 summit in Cananask in early June to so far from Donald Trump. “Why would we invite someone who threatens our sovereignty and our economic welfare?” Why do we invite someone who threatens the economic prosperity of our allies and the world? Why would we allow a crime convicted of entering our country? “He recently asked.
For the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Mélanie Joly, the country’s presence is threatened.
“We are available for families that are available for families that are dependent on these things and dependent on these things. This is not an economic question. As a result, this is the future of our country.
