I wrote one last year 21-part series Tom Fey, who has a negative affect of some players from the Texas section, is about a rule applied in national tri-level invitations. The regulatory body, comprehensive investigating the rules and considered a comprehensive examination of the penalty framework and has been exhausting future issues related to a particular event. Unfortunately I was wrong. As the last weekend in the last week of the year’s national championship, my phone annoyed a more suspicious and seemingly arbitrarily arbitrary rule with the messages of players in San Diego.
So we are going here again. I tried to distribute in an article with this new episode. Unfortunately, as the messages and screenshots spread, this Saga Dovetails was stylishly understood to a topic I planned to write anyway in the end of this month. This is one of the peeling situations as a little onion in the sheets. Today, I am specifically focusing on the captain and the player’s perspective that emerged last weekend. On the next Wednesday, this year, adding a little more nuance to this episode, we will take back the watch with another undocumented new rule. Fun times.
The master Texas team, only one 2024 NTRP 5.0 ranked player, which advises women’s “high” tri-level championship, took action for the last minute. As a result, one of the 4.5 players in the list was necessary to “play” to the field. Tournament heads at the Captain’s session, the players said that the players who were required in advance by the Tournament Committee. The Texas team presented the captain of the possible players, but he said only one was confirmed by one of his players. In fact, the tournament department dictated couples for the 5.0 line throughout the events twice.
“Can you do it?” It is very easy to answer the question. Tom Fey is the National Invitation to National Tri-Level Invitation Championship, but also a national invitation measure. This is a great source of confusion for players because the event can choose and choose the rules from this source freely, despite the master’s league national rules. The master nationally sends a representative of the event every year, but there is no slip or authority over the decisions of the local government. In fact, the tournament can apply any rules where it is desired outside the national control.
There are many discounts to do their rules for tri-level and other national invitations, most players will be documented in these deviations, and operate under hypothesis on the fact that it will communicate in advance and in a logical sense. The root of last year’s fiasco was a new rule in the championship, which was unambiguous and not delivered to all players. Unfortunately, these lessons are probably not studied from this episode, because the new rule applied this year is not well documented. On top of that, a subtle point can apply a rule that the tournament will apply, it comes with the main responsibility of communication before applying the rules to captains and teams. More than next Wednesday.
The director of the tournament stressed that the head of the tournament, which has a negative impact on the decision, stressed that it is designed to provide a Tri-level game. This is a noble and reasonable goal that no one will stay with. However, this does not ignore the facts behind the decision. At the event, Texas team was a player with 5.0 under last year’s ratings, and there were two people in the year. However, the tournament directed the director arbitrarily won the right to play only a 5.0 line of one of these two players. Nuts. Unfortunately, the team was not the current 5.0 players planned to use the line.
If a team player is forced to play the player that would be perfectly reasonable to apply a rule for future events should be a player in the list. The tournament showing that the special player’s election was related to the information of the NTRP performance, the decision was decided on the decision. In addition, they could use current dynamic information that adds another wrinkle.
When the Texas team was not a recent player, the tournament leadership also probably chose only one of the current 4.5S. This is a very faith in the accuracy of the NTRP algorithm, and at the same time, it makes a bad hypothesis or belief that the partnership of the partnerships of the digital ratings of players will be better.
In fact, I think that this defective logic reflected in the other player’s “Authorized” decision has a very good example. While the “K” played the game K “, the tournament committee simply revealed the two of the two dynamic rating. For the couple, I personally think that the player k’s really a stronger player. It is something that I have directly conceived to the double head-by-ending double past year. But I also think that the player is a better one player “A”. Anyone who made power in NTRP rankings should understand that it is not exclusive for double.
To adapt only to choose a player, ignore the complex dynamics of double partnership. One team can force two or two players to play a strong preference to the same accepted court. In addition, sometimes playing styles do not do well together. Sometimes some people can’t play well on the same side of the road because they do not depart. In fact, the choice of the “best” player’s “best” player to determine the information of non-public rankings is likely to have the most powerful couple’s partnership.
In the case of Texas team, I believe that the intended partnership will result in the strongest line where the partnership can put forward in 5.0. In fact, the decision of the Tri-Level Administration forces them to land a weak road. However, the Texas team also has a more subsequent shortcoming for the expected partnership before the event. The potential of the tournament could be able to apply other compounds, probably included these knowledge. The decision of the tournament can be claimed that the Texas has a negative impact on both lines.
One of the justifications given to the team that has a negative impact on this decision should take into account the “player experience” of a slippery slope. In particular, the appearance of the meeting was shown as a basic principle that made this special decision. I hate to collect until next person and have Writing a very recent blog The competition can create this directly speaks directly to the inequality.
However, it is also important to remember that the player’s experience is a two-way street. I do not think that other teams in the tri-level are sinking in this line, when the current 5.0 plays in this line. However, this decision has created a bad experience for Texas players who do not allow them to be the best in the event for research players. I begin to appreciate the administrative claims of the “player experience” as a thinly covered substantiation of a bad decision. To create a bad experience for some players, they are dishonored to others.
Tom Fey, I think in the National Tri-Level Invitations Championship, Tom Manure is very reasonable to think about what to do in this situation. Unfortunately, before I died, I did not have the opportunity to meet him, but I talked to some people who knew him. The culture of the local authorities exhibited at this event is conceptualized by Tom Fey and how to get rid of this event. It was always clear with the players and capitals operating outside the authorities of the master of the master. However, it was also known for taking just and fair decisions. I do not think it would happen under the leadership of this special scenario.
The following Wednesday, we will meet each other to explore how the rules are made and how the rules are done and how it works. There are several additional posts adjacent to this topic in the near future. First, this year, Texas is something that happens in the tri-level sections, which is another useful examination of the player’s experience. I accept the National Uncle National Invitual Championship and their shadow master National Invitation National Uncle National Uncle National Cousin, I need to write a writing of the procedures and procedures. This is the next time this happens, this is the next time with the questions of players who have similar “player experience”, this is for my convenience to explode the phone.
Players should be aware that the national levels of the national-level invitation championship and other national invited events may be aware that the tournament management disadvantages or negatively affecting the player’s experience. Over the past few years, new rules are likely to create new rules as soon as possible. Both players and capitals should also know that it can also be changed or anything to relax from the master national. The bottom line is that the Master League is not notified without warning or logical justification, the national invited events, probably not for you.
