The federal judge in Texas has set a June Test Date for the annual assassination of the US government’s wrong regulators against the wrong regulators 737 MAX Two of the planes were crashed, 346 people were jetliner before killing.
Reed O’Connoru of the District District Judge of the United States On Tuesday, why did not explain why the lawsuit decided to judge the lawsuit. Advocates for Aerospace and Justice Department attempting to separate a 2024 July Plea Agreement He called on Boeing to admit his sin on a single criminal charge.
Judge rejected this deal in December Diversity, input and capital Policies, in the meantime, the Justice Department may affect a monitor option to control the conformity of the company’s proposed sentence.
Since then, O’Connor has extended the last date to start the two sides, they said they plan to continue. The latest extension in the beginning of this month, until April 11, “on the sue for the potential resolution of this work.”
The judge laid a schedule for the trial to the court, which took the value of the tower to the court until June 23, 23, which revoked the remaining time.
The justice department has commented on the judge’s action. The statement of Boeing did not give up any light on the negotiation situation.
“The Boeing and Justice Department continues to engage in conscience about the relevant solution to this issue,” he said.
The agreement refused to approve the judge, said that Boeing will prevent a criminal proceedings to admit guilty to assassinating the regulators of the Federal Aviation Administration confirming minimal pilot-training requirements for Boeing 737 MAX about ten years ago. In the flight simulators, more intensive training would increase the costs to operate a new aircraft model after the airlines.
Boeing’s Development and Certificate Bestseling plane then became a tight center of security investigators Two of the maximum planes crashed In 2018 and 2019, less than five months. There are many relatives of passengers who died on the shores of Indonesia and Ethiopia pushed for the charge Former Boeing officials, the company’s public criminal case and more severe financial penalty.
In response to the criticism of the families of the families of the families of last year, prosecutors said there were no evidence to claim that Boeing played the role in accidents. Prosecutors said O’Connor, who said he was an assassination for fraudulent charges, was the most difficult to prove against Boeing.
O’Connor did not protest against the agreement in December in December Sentence would face Boeing: $ 487.2 million penalty for $ 243.6 million in the penalty of the previous sentence; Requirement to invest in compliance and security programs $ 455 million; And control abroad during a three-year trial.
Instead, the judge chose a negative assessment of this process to choose the outside of a foreigner to close the boeing movements to prevent fraud. A particular concern is required to require the parties to be considered during the employment of the parties to hire an independent monitor … “(Justice) department in accordance with the diversity and accession. “”
“This greatness is confident that this monitor choice of this monitor is confident only in this monitor choice. The parties serve to damage this confidence and peace and fraud.”
Disposal President Donald Trump was signed In the first week of the second term, the federal government tried to end variety, capital and inclusion programs. Trump’s actions can moot the judge’s concern depending on the outcome of legal difficulties.
The return of Trump’s office also means The management of the Justice Department has changed Federal prosecutors decided to follow the lawsuit against Boeing last year.
Boeing, only the Justice Department, which was appointed by the Justice Department last year that the company violated the 2021 contract that protected him against the criminal prosecution in the same fraud.
Government officials began to investigate again after the case a door chips panel flipped In January 2024, a Alaska Airlines 737 max during the flight. This event has renewed its concerns about production quality and safety in Boeing and put the company Under the strong check by regulators and deputies.
Boeing lawyers spoke last year that if the supplification agreement was rejected, the company found a prosaid contract in the Department of Justice violated. O’Connor was not clear to violate the company’s 2021 deals that O’Eingin helped his written position in December.
This story was first displayed on Fortune.com
